Skip to main content

Author Geert Wilders: No Difference Between Islam, Radical Islam

Controversial Dutch politician and author Geert Wilders is speaking out against Islam, but unlike most Westerners he does not draw a distinction between Islam and radical Islam, but claims that they are the same.

Wilders is a member of the Dutch parliament and founder of the Party for Freedom. He said outspokenness about Islam has taken a toll on his life. He has been threatened with death, been taken court, and been banned from other European countries.

"Anybody who dares to speak out against this ideology called Islam will pay a heavy price," he in an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV. "I lived with my wife for six months in a prison cell for security reasons. We didn't commit any crime. We lived in army barracks and safe houses. I always say if I spoke up, which I'm not planning to do, but just for argument's sake, if I spoke out against Christianity, all those things would not have happened. We use the pen and, unfortunately, they use the ax."

Read the rest of the article at NewsMax.com

WILDERS: Resisting threat of fanatical Islam

West must not surrender permanent liberty for temporary tolerance.

As I write these lines, there are police bodyguards at the door. No visitor can enter my office without passing through several security checks and metal detectors. I have been marked for death. I am forced to live in a heavily protected safe house. Every morning, I am driven to my office in the Dutch Parliament building in an armored car with sirens and flashing blue lights. When I go out, I am surrounded, as I have been for the past seven years, by plainclothes police officers. When I speak in public, I wear a bulletproof jacket.

Read more …WILDERS: Resisting threat of fanatical Islam

The Oval: The Court of Public Opinion

Hello America

We have just spent time talking with Geert Wilders.

A man of strong views. A man of controversial views.

A man who is strongly disliked.

But Geert Wilders was never convicted of any crime. He didn’t break any law.

He was, however, convicted in the court of public opinion. His life was – and is – under constant threat.

And because his views are not popular with the elite, the elite have left him exposed to the threats and the hatred. They have not defended his right to free speech.

Read the rest of the article at www.glennbeck.com

More Articles …